My Take on the Deathly Hallows
*** SPOILER WARNING ***
**LONG**
It’s been over twenty four hours since I finished reading Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, and I think it has rattled around in my brain for long enough that I can put forth my honest opinion.
First the things I did not like about the book:
First and foremost, I did not like how Ron, Harry and Hermione spent most of the first half of the book wandering around the woods, unsure what to do. When I think about it, I think it would have been more interesting had she written it in a different way. How about they had a base of operations somewhere, and were working with the Order, or the other Hogwarts kids, and finding information on the Horcruxes? How come Harry was so adamant about keeping them secret, maybe they could have found them faster, or more efficiently, had they told a few others and gotten some help? Harry was old enough to start making his own decisions, it seemed like it would be wise to enlist some more help. Just because Voldemort ‘created’ Harry as his enemy doesn’t mean that Voldemort wouldn’t still have been nasty and wanted to take over the world, even had he never heard of the prophecy. And I felt as though the trio were so isolated during most of the book, I really missed the interaction they usually had with their friends and family.
I think that was my biggest disappointment. Later in the book when they went back to Hogwarts and met Neville, I found myself thinking that I would have rather read the whole book from Neville’s point of view. They were fighting, being rebels, getting beaten up, and going through all the things Harry, Hermione and Ron did in the prior 6 years.
I did not like Snape’s reason for being on Dumbledore’s side. If a love story was not important enough to pursue between Harry and Ginny, or Ron and Hermione, I thought it odd for it to be part of Snape’s past. I did not get the feel that it was a good enough reason. Yes I know, love is important.. but like I’ve read on some other sites, it’s too cliche, it’s been over done. Maybe not for young kids, but for us older readers it just lacked … substance. I wanted something more, something that would really have surprised me.
The best word, for me, to describe the book, is flat. And yeah, I think I’m disappointed. I found it rather predictable. And although I did enjoy reading it, and I actually didn’t find myself getting bored and kept turning the pages, I still felt as though something was missing.
This seventh book didn’t seem to have the heart and soul of the first six. It was almost as if Rowlings had done everything in the first six, and this one she just spit out to close things up, but didn’t put as much life into it as the others.
I did not like how some of the characters died, especially Lupin and Tonks. It seemed to be an afterthought. If an author is going to kill off some well-loved characters, I think there needs to be a good reason for it. I still don’t like that Sirius died, and I had thought he was not really dead. I was disappointed that he didn’t come back through the veil. I did like how Dobby died. That was a valiant, heroic death. It was sad, for sure, and I missed him, but it was done well instead of just seeing his body at the end of the story.
I didn’t really like the Deathly Hallows, as I really think everything that was presented in books 1-6 should have been enough. Instead she introduced another storyline that was brand new.
I don’t like how Snape died. I would have liked to have seen Harry and Snape have a discussion, instead of Harry getting Snape’s memories to view later. Again, it seemed like more isolation.
Another thing I did not like was Harry’s lack of magical skills. I would have liked to have seen him learn more, know more. Perhaps he was an average student and not highly talented like Dumbledore. However, since Dumbledore knew Harry was going to face very high odds, Dumbledore should have equipped Harry with more magical knowledge. I wonder where all the Aurors, and other Order members, learned all their ‘advanced’ magic. Obviously they didn’t learn it in Hogwarts, because we never saw any of the kids learn that stuff. I’ve wondered if there was some sort of magical university that would teach these things. And in book 6 Harry didn’t even know how to dry himself off after swimming to the cave. Seems like that would be a commonly known spell.
Things I did like:
I liked how Dumbledore and Harry met, in King’s Cross station, and had a chat about how things went.
I love how the kids at Hogwarts were standing up for themselves, and protesting in their own way. I would love to see book 7 rewritten from Neville’s point of view.
I do, actually, like how she put the end pieces together, even while I didn’t like the Deathly Hallows. I like that they were able to find, and destroy, the remaining horcruxes. It made sense to me that Harry was the 7th Horcrux, even though when I had read that theory beforehand, I didn’t want it to be. But it ended up being okay. And I like, as I took it, how Voldemort basically blasted the Horcrux out of Harry. Basically killing Harry, but himself as well, and giving Harry the choice of whether to come back to the living world or not. If he did so, Voldemort would come back too.
I like how Voldemort discovered, at long last, that Harry was hunting Horcruxes. I like how Harry faked that he was still dead, only to come back, dramatically as a dramatic story should be, to vanquish his enemy at the end.
I like how Neville killed Nagini. I liked how Neville, Luna and Ginny were the ones leading the rebellions at the school.
Conclusion
As you can see from my very many words about the things I didn’t like, and the few words about the things I did like, I think, overall, I was disappointed.
Finally understanding my own feelings about the book, I say that I liked how the plot worked out, how she fit all the pieces together. But I did not like how she got there.
Like I said, book seven, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, seemed flat to me. As though it was missing the heart and soul she put into the first six books. I am saddened. Saddened that the series is over, and saddened that the seventh book was not what I was hoping for. I did not cry, I did not rejoice, I was not moved as I have been in the past, and I think that, more than anything, is what I missed.
Tags: Harry Potter
July 26th, 2007 at 1:26 pm
I’m not really a harry potter fan, but my oldest son is and he’s allready read the book twice with plans to read it again.
July 26th, 2007 at 1:26 pm
I'm not really a harry potter fan, but my oldest son is and he's allready read the book twice with plans to read it again.
July 26th, 2007 at 8:15 pm
nice
July 27th, 2007 at 10:54 am
Well said! I myself still can’t get over how horrid and trite sounding Rowling made Snape’s reason to join the good guys to be. Love would have been a good reason but the way she worked, well, I don’t think it could have gotten much more cliche there if Snape in one of his memories turned to Harry and said “Harry, I am your father.” XD
Just the manner in which it was executed lacked believability and meat. I think I’ve pretty much made up my mind to ignore that section. Thinking back, I also found it odd that Snape didn’t put up more of a fight in the final confrontation with Voldemort. According to the memory he knew he had to give Harry the necessary information once he saw Voldemort keeping Nagini close by…it seems odd that he wouldn’t have drawn his wand and fought back sooner when he realized Voldemort wasn’t going to let him go back to the fight. Hell, why didn’t he even just bolt?
Indeed having the golden trio isolated for so long is what really made the book drag and wore it down tremendously. I was so impressed with Neville’s bravery and would have LOVED to see him explored more!
Tonks and Lupin? Gah, I’m not even going to get started on that one.
July 27th, 2007 at 10:54 am
Well said! I myself still can't get over how horrid and trite sounding Rowling made Snape's reason to join the good guys to be. Love would have been a good reason but the way she worked, well, I don't think it could have gotten much more cliche there if Snape in one of his memories turned to Harry and said "Harry, I am your father." XD Just the manner in which it was executed lacked believability and meat. I think I've pretty much made up my mind to ignore that section. Thinking back, I also found it odd that Snape didn't put up more of a fight in the final confrontation with Voldemort. According to the memory he knew he had to give Harry the necessary information once he saw Voldemort keeping Nagini close by…it seems odd that he wouldn't have drawn his wand and fought back sooner when he realized Voldemort wasn't going to let him go back to the fight. Hell, why didn't he even just bolt? Indeed having the golden trio isolated for so long is what really made the book drag and wore it down tremendously. I was so impressed with Neville's bravery and would have LOVED to see him explored more! Tonks and Lupin? Gah, I'm not even going to get started on that one.
July 30th, 2007 at 7:46 am
I finally finished this in the wee hours of the morning! Now I can read your blog again! LOL.
I laughed, I cried. I think it was worth the read. I need to read it again in order to make a full opinion. I think I read it too fast!
July 30th, 2007 at 7:46 am
I finally finished this in the wee hours of the morning! Now I can read your blog again! LOL. I laughed, I cried. I think it was worth the read. I need to read it again in order to make a full opinion. I think I read it too fast!
September 18th, 2007 at 1:35 am
With your post, I with really say that you’re a fan of Harry Potter. I’ve watched the movies of Harry Potter and I enjoy it a lot. But my friend of mine told me that I would appreciate it more if I’m going to read the books because some scenes are omitted or not included in the movie, but I was so lazy to read. Then he finally made a blog post in “http://www.autopartsplace.com/harry-potter.htm” and I really understand why should I read the Harry Potter books.
September 18th, 2007 at 1:35 am
With your post, I with really say that you're a fan of Harry Potter. I've watched the movies of Harry Potter and I enjoy it a lot. But my friend of mine told me that I would appreciate it more if I'm going to read the books because some scenes are omitted or not included in the movie, but I was so lazy to read. Then he finally made a blog post in "http://www.autopartsplace.com/harry-potter.htm&qu…and I really understand why should I read the Harry Potter books.
September 23rd, 2007 at 9:01 pm
Hi Leigh, I think I read it too fast, too. I’m listening to the CDs now, and I’m enjoying it more the second time. Still some disappointments.. but I’m liking it better.
September 23rd, 2007 at 9:01 pm
Hi Leigh, I think I read it too fast, too. I'm listening to the CDs now, and I'm enjoying it more the second time. Still some disappointments.. but I'm liking it better.
September 23rd, 2007 at 9:01 pm
Thanks for the reference to that post, Gee. I liked that too. Those 10 things are what I, too, loved about the books.
September 23rd, 2007 at 9:01 pm
Thanks for the reference to that post, Gee. I liked that too. Those 10 things are what I, too, loved about the books.